The way we pick the president means we can save the Great Lakes but not the Chesapeake Bay
After his initial budget threatened to cut 90% of the funding to clean up and preserve the Great Lakes, President Trump announced at a rally in Michigan that the full $300 million budget would be restored.
On the other hand, the same budget still would cut funding to clean up the Chesapeake Bay by 90%—from $93 million to only $7.3 million
Why does the president want to save the Great Lakes but not the Chesapeake Bay? Because Michigan will be a critical swing state in the next election, and no president can afford to potentially anger the small number of voters who, by chance, have the privilege of deciding the election. On the other hand, Maryland’s electoral votes are taken for granted.
This is just one example of how our current presidential election system warps our spending, policies, and priorities with very real consequences.